Thursday, May 24, 2007
Aid for insurance PSUs to cover HIV+
Foreign reinsurers may get India access
PSU insurance cos may not go public
Insurance brokers turn launderers
NEW DELHI: As the government enforces new measures to check money laundering, launderers are targeting insurance companies where large premium payments are split over several transactions to avoid suspicion. Brokerage commissions in cash amount to nearly Rs 900 crore in the non-life sector alone. In the non-life business, insurance brokerage is the most popular mode to launder money. Typically, most traders who want to convert black money into white channelise their operations through a brokerage. The broker promises huge discounts to the client on behalf of the insurer and is also paid a hefty commission. In non-life insurance, which is estimated to be worth Rs 22,000 crore, at least 60% of the business comes from the corporate sector. Of the Rs 12,000-crore business in the segment, Rs 6,000 crore is accounted for by the private sector. With brokerage fees touching 30%, it is estimated that half of this is routed through cash, which amounts to Rs 900 crore. The figure is higher for life insurance companies, which handle business worth Rs 35,000 crore. “Using false invoices and bills issued by a dummy of the brokerage company, the money is routed back to the broker,” an industry source said. In the life insurance business, agents are pivotal in laundering money, receiving commissions in cheques and paying clients in cash, he added. “If an agent or a broker can ensure a cash-revenue stream, insurance is the only sector where a money launderer is paid to launder money,” said a risk management consultant, who pleaded anonymity. Industry insiders say insurance companies are unwilling to crack down on money launderers as it will affect business. “There is no incentive for companies to implement anti-money laundering (AML) measures. They will only go so far as the law prescribes and will not do it of their own volition,” he added. Most insurance companies have internal checks and balances that detect the errant cases and deal with them at their level, obviating the need for supervision by Irda. Insurers, on their part, swear by internal regulations and compliance with stringent AML guidelines. Sources at the enforcement directorate feel this could be more of a I-T evasion measure as against a crime listed under the Anti-Money Laundering Act.
Source: PRITI PATNAIK, TNN, THURSDAY, MAY 10, 2007