RING IN NEW PENSION SCHEME

After winning the trust vote, finance minister P Chidambaram had said the government would push ahead with financial sector reforms. Presumably, this would include key economic legislation encompassing insurance and pensions. On the PFRDA Bill, the government has covered a lot of ground having incorporated some suggestions put forward by a parliamentary committee.

That should address the concerns of lawmakers. Yet, there are issues that must be addressed or at least debated before the legislation is approved. All subscribers to the New Pension Scheme, now mandatory for central government employees who joined service on or after January 1, 2004, have to reckon with a differential tax treatment. In the current tax regime, while contributions to the pensions scheme and earnings are tax exempt, the proceeds are taxed at the applicable personal income tax rate. In vogue in many other mature economies, this is also in line with the exempt exempt tax (EET) method advocated by an expert committee.
This may be a desirable approach. But it overlooks some facts. Comparable long-term social security schemes such as the Employees Provident Fund, Public Provident Fund and the General Provident Fund enjoy a beneficial tax treatment — contribution, earnings and maturity proceeds are tax exempt. It seems discriminatory as it is skewed in favour of the organised sector.

The NPS is designed to bring into its fold not just government staff but lakhs of workers including the self-employed. While providing retirement incomes to a large section of the population is the goal of the scheme, there is the promise of savings flows, which once the NPS gains traction, could fuel the capital needs of industry and infrastructure providers.

It is well known tax treatment drives the behaviour of investors and other financial product providers. In an environment where stocks held for just one year are exempt from long-term capital gains tax, it would be harsh to penalise those trying to build an egg nest. The government has two choices: ensure parity of tax treatment for all long-term social security schemes, or introduce EET across savings products.

Source: The Economic Times